CO2

Les émissions de CO2 pour cet itinéraire sont estimées à: Transports en commun : 68 g CO2 Voiture: 4213 g CO2″

Paying More for Flights Eases Guilt, Not Emissions « Stephen Rees's blog 2009

Now, faced with this lack of knowledge, the standard response from the AGW crowd is it must be CO2″ … but why must it be CO2?

Unthreaded #3 « Climate Audit 2007

It is up to 8 percent more fuel-efficient than other tires in its class* and can reduce a vehicle's CO2 emissions by as much as 2,000 pounds of CO2**.

Automotive Headlines 2009

•Early Spring •More Human Impacts •Warmer Summers - •More CO2 around Winters •CO2 absorbs some

Recently Uploaded Slideshows 2009

Also, the correlations probably work rather well against CO2 change, rather than temperature change PCA does not attach a little white flag to the result that says “I’m temperature” or “I’m CO2″.

Bürger and "Skill" « Climate Audit 2007

He showed all the main figures of the AR4 SPMs. At the end of the morning session I made him notice that in one of his slide on GHGs he had put a huge word “CO2″ and some smaller ones “CH4, NOx and CFC” and a ten times bigger H2O was missing, forgetting also to say that water makes this planet confortable and not CO2.

Unthreaded #9 « Climate Audit 2007

Global CO2 Emissions from Fossil-Fuel Burning, Cement Manufacture, and Gas Flaring: 1751-2003″ is about ‘CO2′ and not ‘carbon’, at least when one is speaking English.

A few inconvenient truths « Climate Audit 2006

By claiming that “doubled CO2″ is analogous to “doubled energy dissipation” is completely erroneous and helps to promote the flawed notion that CO2 is itself an additional source of energy to the dumbed down masses.

Letter to NAS « Climate Audit 2006

So if there is something magic about “the historic value of 280 ppm CO2″ and that it is just related to “the saturation level that ice has wrt CO2 at surface P and T” please answer the following: 1. Why was the CO2 level less than 200 ppm during the last few glacial maxima?

John Hunter on Sea Levels « Climate Audit 2006

It is pointless to argue with your numbers if you continue to claim that “C” is the same as “CO2″ — they are not — they are related by the atomic weight of C (12) and molecular weight of CO2 (44).

A few inconvenient truths « Climate Audit 2006