sanpete

Jeff Kaye March 18th, 2010 at 3: 22 pm sanpete @ 65

Firedoglake emptywheel 2010

Even if they were wrong about that, there's no question that they believed it. sanpete @ 59

Firedoglake emptywheel 2010

And I liked what qwyereous linked on an earlier thread, that came up in the context of who the minder was for Fitzgerald's response to Conyers et al, bc he linked the minder to the memo that responded to the finally asked question by Congress of what DOJ thought "humane treatment" meant. emptywheel March 18th, 2010 at 3: 52 pm sanpete @ 59 sanpete

Firedoglake emptywheel 2010

While attempts to communicate with him are laudable, on some level, certainly (it must be imagined), all such attempts are doomed, as sanpete remains apart, untouched by reason and unsullied by doubt, and unaffected by informed commentary.

Firedoglake emptywheel 2010

It is a wonder that does not cease in its amazement. bmaz March 18th, 2010 at 2: 46 pm sanpete @ 65

Firedoglake emptywheel 2010

He fancies himself our salvation, I have come to suspect, but why he would waste his precious time and most-perceptive self on such as gather here, when all of whom, appearances would suggest, are considered by the great sanpete to be unworthy of his august and munificent presence … is a wonder.

Firedoglake emptywheel 2010

It will be interesting to see what organizations refer to this op-ed in their tv appearances, etc.. tjbs March 18th, 2010 at 3: 07 pm sanpete @ 65

Firedoglake emptywheel 2010