Definitions
from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.
- noun A law court.
- noun The bench where a judge or other presiding judicial officer sits in court.
- noun The place where a session of court is held.
- noun A committee or board appointed to adjudicate in a particular matter.
- noun Something that has the power to determine or judge.
from The Century Dictionary.
- noun The seat of a magistrate or judge; the bench on which a judge and his associates sit to administer justice.
- noun Hence A court of justice.
- noun Eccles., the confessional.
- noun [Sp. pron. trē-bö-näl′ .] In villages in the Philippines, a kind of town-hall or common house, used as a meeting-place by the bead men of the village, for the entertainment of travelers, and for other purposes of general interest.
from the GNU version of the Collaborative International Dictionary of English.
- noun The seat of a judge; the bench on which a judge and his associates sit for administering justice.
- noun Hence, a court or forum.
- noun In villages of the Philippine Islands, a kind of townhall. At the tribunal the head men of the village met to transact business, prisoners were confined, and troops and travelers were often quartered.
from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
- noun An
assembly including one or morejudges to conductjudicial business; acourt oflaw .
from WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.
- noun an assembly (including one or more judges) to conduct judicial business
Etymologies
from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition
from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
Support
Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word tribunal.
Examples
-
Here in MA, for example, the tribunal is a doctor, a lawyer and a judge who hear evidence to determine whether it is actually a malpractice case or mroe along th elines of an unfortunate medical result.
Liberal Dems 'stand in strong opposition' to Sebelius statement 2009
-
If treatment under civilian tribunal is no different than military, why are you up in arms about it?
The Volokh Conspiracy » Faisal Shahzad Allegedly Admits to Attempted Times Square Bombing 2010
-
He said the tribunal is independent and has a clear mandate from the Security Council "to uncover the truth and end impunity."
-
Words come to mind that I can't print in their entirety, that the tribunal is full of petty popinjay chickens**ts.
-
A U.N. tribunal is investigating the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq al-Hariri.
-
Mark Buehner: If treatment under military tribunal is no different than civilian, why is everybody up in arms about it?
The Volokh Conspiracy » Faisal Shahzad Allegedly Admits to Attempted Times Square Bombing 2010
-
An as yet unidentified Norwich Green councillor has been banned from being a national member for 5 years for actions which seem to amount what the Greens tribunal is interpretting as breaching the Data Protection Act. Yet because of their bizare system this individual can continue to be a Norwich Green councillor.
The not so clean Green Party Norfolk Blogger 2009
-
The tribunal is expected to indict members of the powerful Lebanese Shiite faction - Hezbollah.
-
If treatment under military tribunal is no different than civilian, why is everybody up in arms about it?
The Volokh Conspiracy » Faisal Shahzad Allegedly Admits to Attempted Times Square Bombing 2010
-
This tribunal is independent, with a clear mandate from the Security Council to uncover the truth and end impunity.
Comments
Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.