NRO

And ifyou do believe that, how does that make the sort of idiocy published in NRO correct?

The Civility Plea, Arnold Kling | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty 2009

NRO is famous for two things (1) A sharp partisan bias, and (2) an incredibly low level of knowledge and analysis.

Pseudonymity and Accountability 2009

Times are changing though, and the case of Hubble is starting get some in NRO to think about servicing their satellites, rather than throwing them away.

Astronauts Once Again Demonstrate Why Humans Must be a Part of Space Exploration - NASA Watch 2009

Yes indeed, NRO is thinking about servicing satellites, but their ideas are wholly robotic, with autonomy as well (Orbital Express, F5, etc.)

Astronauts Once Again Demonstrate Why Humans Must be a Part of Space Exploration - NASA Watch 2009

Claiming that "what's good for DoD/NRO is also good for NASA" and expecting the rest of us to accept it at face value is what really shows 'lack of understanding'.

Obama Speaks of NASA Being Adrift - NASA Watch 2009

Kathleen had written in NRO that she felt Sarah Palin was an embarrassment.

Christopher Buckley Supports Obama: ‘Sorry Dad, I Was Fired’ From The Magazine You Founded | Disinformation 2008

The bottom line is, though, if NRO is going to distort the science in their basic argumentation, why go into a detailed discussion of the science?

Think Progress » How The National Review Bastardizes James Hansen’s Global Warming Research 2006

Almost every Murray post period on NRO is a Gore smear.

Think Progress » CEI Scholar: Gore Thinks Climate Change is Caused by ‘Widespread Sin,’ a Sign of ‘the Antichrist’ 2006

I mean, if Karl Rove and the gang at NRO is going to leap into the fray on the side of Weepin 'Joe Lieberman (I-Green Room), why shouldn't you throw your self behind the candidate who's taking big old chunks out of a guy mired, alas, in that wing of the GOP marked Not Insane?

August 2006 2006

Anyway, Victor David Hanson has a great piece in NRO summarizing why Ward Churchill represents what is wrong in academia today.

Coyote Blog » 2005 » March 2005