A fallacy that assumes that an abstract entity dictates or authorizes or causes the attributes or characteristics or outcome or situation of a concrete entity, usually done when assuming conceptual limits or boundaries with physical limits or boundaries.
An example of this is blaming a government for starving a group of people, if the government has no influence on this group of people and there are no real-life laws affecting this group of people, then it can be seen as fallacious to assume that starvation dictates the attitudes and characteristics of the written laws of the government. Just because an entity might not be aware of an issue doesn’t mean the entity is guilty of neglecting an issue. A simplified form of an example of this could be “If starving (concept) happens and if something doesn’t reduce the amount of starving, then starving has caused this something to neglect starvation and therefore this something is guilty of neglecting starvation”. The fallacy in the last sentence quote assumes that starving caused the “something” to neglect reducing starvation, though from what is concluded, there is no known correlation between the cause of starving and the effect that “something” has on it. A lack of correlation between two interoexistential (between or among entities of existence and non-existence) entities.
The difference between the fallacy of misplaced correctness and the Abstract-Concrete fallacy is that this fallacy also assumes that the abstract entity has concrete authority over the concrete entity, this fallacy is a hyponym of the fallacy of misplaced correctness, a type of fallacy of misplaced correctness.
Hence in the example, the concept of starvation is not just assumed to be the same as starvation itself or the lack of actions related to or about starvation but that this concept has the authority to hold concrete entities accountable for a lack of partaking actions. Another example is that just because the concept of life is mentioned doesn’t mean that life happens, or that simply the mentioning of the concept of life authorizes for life to happen.
Godwin’s law, used to have neutrality with the author of the law (Matt Godwin) and to actualize the terminology of the word, as the phrase “Lex Hitleromi” has been seen as a more straight-forward or logical name for the law, as the law is about the Hitlerom (Latin for Hitler or the Nazi Party or Nazis).
Some prefer the term Godwin’s Law because it is shorter than Lex Hitleromi.
The law that states that when Godwin’s law is fulfilled or is a perception of fulfillment or is an attempted perspective of a perception of fulfillment, the entity of or surrounding the fulfillment or perception of fulfillment or an attempted perspective of a perception of fulfillment of Godwin’s law should function less as a conversation ender and more as a conversation starter, and should function as a means of starting discussion or thought exploration as opposed to ending a discussion or thought exploration.
For reference: Godwin’s law: The law that states that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.
A morpheme that is added onto a derivative word, which wasn’t in the original word of the derivative word.
There are three morphemes in the word admorpheme (ad + morph + eme), but there is only one admorpheme in the word admorpheme, because the only morpheme that was added onto the word was ad-.
separation that is made in order to associate Latinate prefixes with orders of magnitude less than one, and to associate Greek prefixes with orders of magnitude greater than one.
Like adjective triannual (happens every one third of a year) in contrast to adjective triennial (happens every three years)
Etymology: Latin pro “for” + testis “witness” + ant “end”, though Latin testis is also a cognate of three, meaning at some point in time the word witness was used to mean “three of something”, in this context, probably the third position (standing) on something, coincidentally enough, Protestantism is the third main denomination of Christianity to arise. In an etymological sense, a protestant “for-three-stand” is “for the third standing (position) of Christian subreligions”. Hence the word forþrestand/forthreestand can describe a person who is for the third-standing branch of Christendom.
Etymology: Ancient Greek κατά “against, downwards” is cognate with English, hind “behind”, Ancient Greek ὅλος “whole” is cognate with English, whole. Ancient Greek -ικός “ish” is cognate with English -y.
In an etymological sense, the word means “behind-whole-ish” as pertaining to “behind the whole church”. For many years, catholics were “behind the whole church” because Catholicism was the offical religion of most of Europe before Protestantism rivaled it. Another example of how history can shape the meaning of words.
In comparison to direct cognates of this word, this word has more of a societal connotation than other direct cognates rather than time aspect or being related to law.
Used to turn verbs into nouns which are usually done by third person pronouns, in a sense can also be used to show that oneself either wants to disassociate themselves or be uninvolved with the verb or verb clause in relation to this suffix.
other, another and or different; het- or heta-, used to show that the connectivity or coordinateness of the term being described is unknown or ambiguous.
An idea that affixes containing a connecting conjunction should be written with an “o” and that affixes containing a coordinating conjunction should be written with an “a”, this pattern follows the gender scheme vowel differences of a number of languages, this idea also notes that “e” could be used when the connectivity or coordinateness of the conjunction(s) of an affix are unknown or ambiguous.
Etymology: “o” from “au” from Latin “aut” (or), and “a” from “ai” from Greek “kai” (and).
Comments by 4951172
4951172 commented on the word tro-
three in relation, especially to each other especially not apart, not asunder.
Etymology: tri- + codependence
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word quaco
four entities together, especially if containing something
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word dimpt-
two things impartially not in a relation, especially impartially not to each other especially impartially apart, impartially asunder
Etymology: di- + impartial
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word dipt-
two things partially not in a relation, especially partially not to each other especially partially apart, partially asunder
Etymology: di- + partial
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word impo
A bisyllabic shortening of the word important, used especially to differentiate from impt which can mean both important or impartial.
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word impt
impartial, can be used as both a noun or an affix
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -pt-
Affix used to mean “partial” or in parts.
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -ality and -ity idea
An idea that proposes that -ality should mean “a quality” and -ity should mean “an entity”.
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word interoexistentity
An interoexistential entity
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word interoexistentiality
The quality of having introexistential entities (introexistentities).
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word intera-
between and among, especially used with Latinate or Greek words
Etymology: inter- + Greek kai.
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word intero-
between or among, especially used with Latinate words
Etymology: inter- + Latin aut.
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word interoexistential
between or among entities of existence and non-existence
Etymology: intero- + existential
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word Abstract-Concrete Fallacy
A fallacy that assumes that an abstract entity dictates or authorizes or causes the attributes or characteristics or outcome or situation of a concrete entity, usually done when assuming conceptual limits or boundaries with physical limits or boundaries.
An example of this is blaming a government for starving a group of people, if the government has no influence on this group of people and there are no real-life laws affecting this group of people, then it can be seen as fallacious to assume that starvation dictates the attitudes and characteristics of the written laws of the government. Just because an entity might not be aware of an issue doesn’t mean the entity is guilty of neglecting an issue. A simplified form of an example of this could be “If starving (concept) happens and if something doesn’t reduce the amount of starving, then starving has caused this something to neglect starvation and therefore this something is guilty of neglecting starvation”. The fallacy in the last sentence quote assumes that starving caused the “something” to neglect reducing starvation, though from what is concluded, there is no known correlation between the cause of starving and the effect that “something” has on it. A lack of correlation between two interoexistential (between or among entities of existence and non-existence) entities.
The difference between the fallacy of misplaced correctness and the Abstract-Concrete fallacy is that this fallacy also assumes that the abstract entity has concrete authority over the concrete entity, this fallacy is a hyponym of the fallacy of misplaced correctness, a type of fallacy of misplaced correctness.
Hence in the example, the concept of starvation is not just assumed to be the same as starvation itself or the lack of actions related to or about starvation but that this concept has the authority to hold concrete entities accountable for a lack of partaking actions. Another example is that just because the concept of life is mentioned doesn’t mean that life happens, or that simply the mentioning of the concept of life authorizes for life to happen.
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word remembract
The act of remembering
A hyponym of remembrance
January 29, 2025
4951172 commented on the word Lex Hitleromi
Godwin’s law, used to have neutrality with the author of the law (Matt Godwin) and to actualize the terminology of the word, as the phrase “Lex Hitleromi” has been seen as a more straight-forward or logical name for the law, as the law is about the Hitlerom (Latin for Hitler or the Nazi Party or Nazis).
Some prefer the term Godwin’s Law because it is shorter than Lex Hitleromi.
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word Godwin’s fulfillment law
The law that states that when Godwin’s law is fulfilled or is a perception of fulfillment or is an attempted perspective of a perception of fulfillment, the entity of or surrounding the fulfillment or perception of fulfillment or an attempted perspective of a perception of fulfillment of Godwin’s law should function less as a conversation ender and more as a conversation starter, and should function as a means of starting discussion or thought exploration as opposed to ending a discussion or thought exploration.
For reference: Godwin’s law: The law that states that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word Wankpanzer
German word for cybertruck, especially a cybertruck in Germany or made in Germany
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word admorpheme
A morpheme that is added onto a derivative word, which wasn’t in the original word of the derivative word.
There are three morphemes in the word admorpheme (ad + morph + eme), but there is only one admorpheme in the word admorpheme, because the only morpheme that was added onto the word was ad-.
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word diinterpersonal
interpersonal of two things not in relation to eachother, especially if these two things are different from one another.
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word do-
two in relation, especially to each other especially not apart, not asunder.
Etymology: duo- + codependence, this is because things that are in relation to each other can be codependent to eachother.
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word di-
two things not in relation, especially not to each other especially apart, asunder
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word Latin-Greek Magnitude Prefix Seperation
separation that is made in order to associate Latinate prefixes with orders of magnitude less than one, and to associate Greek prefixes with orders of magnitude greater than one.
Like adjective triannual (happens every one third of a year) in contrast to adjective triennial (happens every three years)
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word mattrans-
trans-, used especially of a context of mathematics
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word tri-
three in a consecutive sense
January 28, 2025
4951172 commented on the word responcy
A reply or a response
Compare with: responce
January 27, 2025
4951172 commented on the word questiase
A worded or expressed phrase, which asks for information, a reply, or a response, (a responcy); a question phrase.
January 27, 2025
4951172 commented on the word responce
To reply or respond
Cognate with response
January 27, 2025
4951172 commented on the word questience
A worded or expressed sentence, which asks for information, a reply, or a response; an interrogative sentence.
This is a hyponym of the word question.
January 27, 2025
4951172 commented on the word forþrestand
protestant (Etymological Anglish)
Etymology: Latin pro “for” + testis “witness” + ant “end”, though Latin testis is also a cognate of three, meaning at some point in time the word witness was used to mean “three of something”, in this context, probably the third position (standing) on something, coincidentally enough, Protestantism is the third main denomination of Christianity to arise. In an etymological sense, a protestant “for-three-stand” is “for the third standing (position) of Christian subreligions”. Hence the word forþrestand/forthreestand can describe a person who is for the third-standing branch of Christendom.
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word hindwholy
catholic (Etymological Anglish)
Etymology: Ancient Greek κατά “against, downwards” is cognate with English, hind “behind”, Ancient Greek ὅλος “whole” is cognate with English, whole. Ancient Greek -ικός “ish” is cognate with English -y.
In an etymological sense, the word means “behind-whole-ish” as pertaining to “behind the whole church”. For many years, catholics were “behind the whole church” because Catholicism was the offical religion of most of Europe before Protestantism rivaled it. Another example of how history can shape the meaning of words.
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word cwroth
To be wroth with all the congregation
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word bangry
To be angry after it was burnt
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word swroth
To be wroth with the servants of oneself
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word thwroth
To be wroth against them
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word twroth
To be wroth against two
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word apprecia
acts towards or for the cause of appreciation, especially in response to appreciation or something created because of appreciation
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word dys-
difficult, bad status, bad
In comparison to direct cognates of this word, this word has more of a societal connotation than other direct cognates rather than time aspect or being related to law.
January 26, 2025
4951172 commented on the word unsreflective
unreflective of oneself, especially if only oneself
Differentiation of disreflective
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word disreflective
unreflective of oneself or society
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -iff
Suffix for third person future tense for abstract verbs or verbs of abstract nouns
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -eff
Suffix for third person future tense
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word theyl
contraction of they will
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -ith
Used to make abstract nouns
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -ung
Used to make gerunds
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -oth
Used to turn verbs into nouns which are usually done by third person pronouns, in a sense can also be used to show that oneself either wants to disassociate themselves or be uninvolved with the verb or verb clause in relation to this suffix.
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -ath
Suffix for third person inclusive or coordinating pronouns
means “he/she/it and maybe or possibly another”, means “he/she/it and X”
It is like “and they”, where “and” lets inclusion happen.
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word -ad
Suffix used to describe past perfect tense.
Example: “I had swimmed” -> I swimmad.
Etymology: from had
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word payn
French bread
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word italbrac
Italian bread, especially cuisine made
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word froong
food rings, irregular plural
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word jring
A round piece of (precious) metal worn around the finger or through the ear, nose, or other body part; a jewelery ring
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word wrongu
wrong or uneven
Etymology: from Old English, wrengþu
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word wreng
To measure wrongness
Etymology: from Old English wrangl
Compare: wrong/long, wreng/leng, wrength/length
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word hete-
other, another and or different; het- or heta-, used to show that the connectivity or coordinateness of the term being described is unknown or ambiguous.
Etymology: clipping of hetero-
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word heta-
other, another and different
Etymology: Greek hetero- + Greek kai
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word het-
hetero-, monosyllabic form
means other, another, different
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word homa-
homa- : identical; same and identical, used especially with Latinate words
Etymology : Latin homo- + Greek kai
See also: O-A Conjunction Affixmaking Idea
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word hetma-
hetma- : other, another or different, and then identical
Etymology: hetero- + homa-
A connecting conjunction prefix, See also: O-A Conjunction Affixmaking Idea
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word O-A Conjunction Affixmaking Idea
An idea that affixes containing a connecting conjunction should be written with an “o” and that affixes containing a coordinating conjunction should be written with an “a”, this pattern follows the gender scheme vowel differences of a number of languages, this idea also notes that “e” could be used when the connectivity or coordinateness of the conjunction(s) of an affix are unknown or ambiguous.
Etymology: “o” from “au” from Latin “aut” (or), and “a” from “ai” from Greek “kai” (and).
January 25, 2025
4951172 commented on the word hetmo-
hetmo- : other, another or different, then same or identical
Etymology: hetero- + homo-
A connecting conjunction prefix, See also: O-A Conjunction Affixmaking Idea
January 25, 2025