petrbuben has adopted no words, looked up 0 words, created 0 lists, listed 0 words, written 8 comments, added 0 tags, and loved 0 words.
Comments for petrbuben
-
Merry Christmas to you as well! I see that you are not a native English speaker, which excuses some of the perceived spamminess (machine-generated translations share much in common with machine-generated ads). And I apologize for my rudeness earlier.
Though if I may add, I believe the definition of conspiracy theory is something like "an unconfirmed claim of two or more parties conspiring in a clandestine manner." Whether the logistics of the conspiracy are plausible isn't really the issue. I have no doubt that some conspiracy theories are true, but as long as they remain unconfirmed, they still belong in that category. This is just semantics though.
December 24, 2009
-
@uselessness .. well, I see internet as a forum for exchange, of ideas, contacts, fun, and links ..links definitely also. I know what you are saying, it maybe a little easy, do drop too many links, but I would not call it a spam. I am presenting you with some sources, on my profile, you are not forced or told to really go there. But I will not post too many, or more of links, regarding 9/11 controlled demolition. ...... and by the way, really, it is not a "conspiracy theory". Buildings do not evaporate or pulverize with the speed close to a free fall. ... I will leave you with this link - nicetranslator.com :] ... Merry Christmas!
December 23, 2009
-
@Milosrdenstvi .. Zdravim Vas! Kdo, nebo co je Callicles ale nevim. Nejaky filosof nejspise? chechy.nexo.com :] Happy Hollidays!
December 23, 2009
-
Why do you put a URL in every comment, petrbuben? It's kind of, well, spammy's not the right word... actually, on second thought, spammy is the perfect word.
We like to have conversations around here without every statement including a call to action. Endlessly repeating links makes you sound like a used-car salesman, more interested in your agenda than actually Wordnikking with other people. Try commenting on some pages unrelated to 9/11 and see what it's like to use the site without peddling your conspiracy theory. You might like it.
December 23, 2009
-
Callicles...
December 22, 2009
-
Last time I checked, the Loch Ness Monster ate it up. Could you get it to regurgitate the link for me?
December 22, 2009
-
@yarb .. moon landings. yeah i have heard something. it is not credible that moon landing is a fake. ........ Loch Ness monster is a freemason? i did not know that. it is meaningless, unprovable and a good joke too :] ........ have you looked up http://ae911truth.org? ..it's free
December 22, 2009
-
Hey, yarb...would you happen to know if BigFoot is a freemason too?
December 22, 2009
-
Yeah. Nostradamus, who actually survived the Roswell incident, told me so.
December 22, 2009
-
Did you know the Loch Ness Monster is a freemason?
December 22, 2009
-
C'mon yarb, that wasn't a sasquatch. It was a Mossad secret agent.
December 22, 2009
-
And how 'bout those moon landings, eh? If you look real close you can the sasquatch there on the horizon.
December 22, 2009
-
@Prolagus ... well, scientific fact can be both refutable and irrefutable. i guess it depends on how it was proven, rationalized. ... in this case, 100% conclusive evidence. and, nanothermite high military explosive was found on the site too. ... http://friendfeed.com/petrbuben .... http://911blogger.com .. we need new investigation.
December 22, 2009
-
@yarb ..yes. exactly. would a Wordniker, be it a new one, such as myself, ever lie to you about the most important event of our times?? :].. check the science, at http://ae911truth.org ..... http://911UnitedWeInvestigate.blogspot.com
December 22, 2009
-
If something is "irrefutable", it's not a scientific fact. A scientific fact is a good way to explain something, until a more convincing explanation is available.
December 22, 2009
-
I have always been reluctant to believe in "conspiracy" theories, or to give credence to hypotheses varying significantly from the mainstream account. But now that someone on Wornik has told me that there is irrefutable scientific evidence, I have no choice but to change my view. Halleluiah! 9/11 was an inside job! *runs off in a frenzy of flyposting*
December 22, 2009
-
Exactly, Soapbox Man. Give 'em enough rope ...
December 21, 2009
-
the purpose is to leave a comment, that is all.
December 21, 2009
-
...having nothing to do with the stated purposes of Wordnik.
GET LOST.
December 21, 2009
-
no, it is not a spam, or conspiracy. it is an irrefutable scientific fact. 9/11 is an inside operation, done by rogue domestic and foreign elements. we need new investigation of who did it. ... nanothermite explosive was found on the WTC site. ... http://newsrecord.wordpress.com
December 21, 2009
-
Conspiracy spam?
December 21, 2009
-
9/11 is a controlled demolition, per irrefutable scientific evidence, per common sense. http://ae911truth.org - http://911unitedweinvestigate.blogspot.com
December 21, 2009
Comments by petrbuben
petrbuben commented on the user petrbuben
@uselessness .. well, I see internet as a forum for exchange, of ideas, contacts, fun, and links ..links definitely also. I know what you are saying, it maybe a little easy, do drop too many links, but I would not call it a spam. I am presenting you with some sources, on my profile, you are not forced or told to really go there. But I will not post too many, or more of links, regarding 9/11 controlled demolition. ...... and by the way, really, it is not a "conspiracy theory". Buildings do not evaporate or pulverize with the speed close to a free fall. ... I will leave you with this link - nicetranslator.com :] ... Merry Christmas!
December 23, 2009
petrbuben commented on the user petrbuben
@Milosrdenstvi .. Zdravim Vas! Kdo, nebo co je Callicles ale nevim. Nejaky filosof nejspise? chechy.nexo.com :] Happy Hollidays!
December 23, 2009
petrbuben commented on the user petrbuben
@yarb .. moon landings. yeah i have heard something. it is not credible that moon landing is a fake. ........ Loch Ness monster is a freemason? i did not know that. it is meaningless, unprovable and a good joke too :] ........ have you looked up http://ae911truth.org? ..it's free
December 22, 2009
petrbuben commented on the user petrbuben
@Prolagus ... well, scientific fact can be both refutable and irrefutable. i guess it depends on how it was proven, rationalized. ... in this case, 100% conclusive evidence. and, nanothermite high military explosive was found on the site too. ... http://friendfeed.com/petrbuben .... http://911blogger.com .. we need new investigation.
December 22, 2009
petrbuben commented on the user petrbuben
@yarb ..yes. exactly. would a Wordniker, be it a new one, such as myself, ever lie to you about the most important event of our times?? :].. check the science, at http://ae911truth.org ..... http://911UnitedWeInvestigate.blogspot.com
December 22, 2009
petrbuben commented on the user petrbuben
the purpose is to leave a comment, that is all.
December 21, 2009
petrbuben commented on the user petrbuben
no, it is not a spam, or conspiracy. it is an irrefutable scientific fact. 9/11 is an inside operation, done by rogue domestic and foreign elements. we need new investigation of who did it. ... nanothermite explosive was found on the WTC site. ... http://newsrecord.wordpress.com
December 21, 2009
petrbuben commented on the user petrbuben
9/11 is a controlled demolition, per irrefutable scientific evidence, per common sense. http://ae911truth.org - http://911unitedweinvestigate.blogspot.com
December 21, 2009