When the judge himself or herself initiates an action against a person or company for a violation of law about which nobody has lodged any complaint to any public authority -- but about which judge has himself came to know through personal experience.
Suppose a person slaps another man in open road and suddenly a judge sees that incident -- now even if nobody has complained to the police about this incident or nobody has told the judge about this incident -- but as the judge has himself seen this incident--he can initiate action against that person himself in a court of law
Such a case is known as "Suomoto case".
Suomoto cases generally end up in the conviction of the person against whom the action is initiated. and the chances of acquittal in such cases are very minor.
Comments by p.madhurikiran
p.madhurikiran commented on the word nihilism
Reading Fredrick neitchze AntiChrist - where the author points out that Schopaneour has nihilism.
Good Learning for Today
August 12, 2013
p.madhurikiran commented on the user p.madhurikiran
When the judge himself or herself initiates an action against a person or company for a violation of law about which nobody has lodged any complaint to any public authority -- but about which judge has himself came to know through personal experience.
Suppose a person slaps another man in open road and suddenly a judge sees that incident -- now even if nobody has complained to the police about this incident or nobody has told the judge about this incident -- but as the judge has himself seen this incident--he can initiate action against that person himself in a court of law
Such a case is known as "Suomoto case".
Suomoto cases generally end up in the conviction of the person against whom the action is initiated. and the chances of acquittal in such cases are very minor.
August 7, 2013